Human history is filled with war crimes and genocide of different scales and shades. Experts on Genocide have a personal favourite in debates on what qualifies as a Genocide. Does one go by numbers, intent or maybe both. They seem quite oblivious to the detached cruelty in their statements on genocide for it goes far beyond the numbers game. The stark dehumanization in the approach has them present it as concepts used in association with any hunt. This attitude towards the victim clearly demonstrates the ground rule - anything is permissible as long as the goal of annihilation is upheld, and its justification is grounded in shades of grey enough to deflect any accountability. No religion can today claim innocence from the violence that accompanies Holy Wars, Christianity, especially. Even though Christ spoke of love, peace and nonviolence, ardent Christians sought and embraced violence to assert their Faith. The only religion that may claim some limited innocence is Buddhism, tho...
A space to explore and known our world, our association with drugs, relevance and limitation of UN drug conventions, our digital age and relevance of AI, on Palestine, gender discrimination especially in India and Kerala, peace strategies, limitation of negative peace, blitzkrieg, towards this have used works of Kant and Heidegger to understand our search for altered states of consciousness, our search for peace and way we strategize ourselves.