MollyCharles-Reflections

The definition of a terrorist often takes on shades of those groups to which the term is applied and this ensures there in no complete consensus as to Who is a terrorist? But there is clarity on certain aspects, the rationale for the terror act, methods used and power structure enjoyed by the terrorist group. Till recently designation “terrorist group” was generally given to groups functioning outside existing systems of governance and using excessive lethal force viable for them or using threat of the same to achieve their goals.   It largely tended to be groups from countries outside the West, for they felt throttled by the existing mechanism of governance, be it unanswered questions for right to homeland, or being second class citizens in their own land or being denied the basic access such as right to land or hunger free existence. Now, this has changed, thanks to President Trump as the most brutal terror acts on defenceless fishermen out at sea or even on international water...

  Sanctions were meant to act at deterrence but it has been used by the US more than any other country to maintain its stronghold on nations and assert its right to impunity and ensure the international community understands the US is above the law, this has been subtle till President Trump took office this term. Under President Trump, the only international relations that US has practiced is to assert it is a Rogue State and US President is asserting his right to be Rogue with legal liability. If the international community had called his bluff, when he first invaded Iran and dropped bombs on Nuclear facility in Iran with the claim that presence of enriched Uranium 65 Percent meant Iran is making nuclear war heads. No one bother to call out the blatant lie, the plan to use logical fallacy to control international narrative, for if Iran really wanted to have nuclear warhead, it could have just done what India, Pakistan, or North Korea did, which is to enrich uranium in silence an...