Molly Charles-Reflections

  According to Rome Statute Art 31, Grounds for excluding criminal responsibility, Article 31 (1) (a), a person is not criminally responsible if, at the time of their conduct, the person suffers from a mental disease or defect that destroys that person’s capacity to appreciate the unlawfulness or nature of his or her conduct, or capacity to control his or her conduct to conform to the requirement of law [1]. If the idea is to exempt the US President from acts of War Crimes and Acts of Terror that he himself declares on line he has carried out using Rome Statue Art 31 or similar domestic legal provisions, then wouldn’t the US Congress be criminally liable for not restraining him even when he was clearly carrying out war crimes across countries without legal sanction for the criminal attacks. The question that remains unaddressed, isn’t the US Congress criminally liable for acts of the US President as they in spite of clear evidence from his self-declared explanation, reflections...

The US has got it wrong 'Rogue States' are not outside its borders; the award-winning Rogue State is within its borders. This a “great” achievement under Trump, who can be awarded as the most eloquent, and experienced person on “being Rogue”. The US President often states he is a man for peace, but his actions speak otherwise, from 2025, the US President has made it clear that being “Rogue” and carrying out terror acts is central to his foreign relationship. The US Congress through its silence supports the US President, who from the time of taking office last year, till now, as the President of the US has been solely responsible for initiating war in Iran, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Somalia, Nigeria and Venezuela. This is an outstanding feat for the US President. The US President has been generous at dropping bombs and missiles across the globe, to free citizens in different nations or to carry out SMART, EVIDENCE FREE and Out of Court initiatives for drug trade control. The US Pres...