MollyCharles-Reflections

  In recent days the media has been focusing on the US President threatening to “Take over Cuba”. He elaborated further according to him, “I can take it, make it and do whatever I want with it”. It is strange to hear the US President speak about another sovereign country in this manner, evidently President Trump seems to understand sovereignty only in terms of the US and sees no relevance of it to its neighbors, as clearly illustrated in case of Venezuela. Americans from his party tend to brush it aside by saying that's his style, but that’s exactly the point, that can’t be his style as a President of the US or any other country, a verbal threat from a person in power cannot be condoned or legitimatized as part of international relationship. The abuse of Cuba is beyond political ideological difference, or a democracy’s anger at communist ideology, it is historically planned control of the entire region by the United States to make United States of Americas under the total control...

Since no one is willing to bell the cat, I am doing it. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and its representatives are not being governed by truth but rather by what is palatable to the United States and Israel. IAEA has been after Iran not directly, but mentioning grey areas of concerns and how  Uranium enrichment from 60 percent to nuclear arms grade product can be done in short time. All concerns seem legitimate on surface, but let’s look at the layered reality that make up the surface. Countries that have nuclear War Heads and their reality Other than the originator of a nuclear weapon in 1945, the United States; eight other countries acquired the technology and went ahead and weaponised the same as part of their national security approach. These countries are Russia (1949), UK (1952), France (1960), China (1964), India (1974), Pakistan (1998), North Korea (2006) and Israel (1967). Not a single country declared to the IAEA in advance their plans to enrich Uranium, it...

    While Israelis believe a higher world authority has given them the right to be above international law, the US President and US administration along with its legal expertise believe that the world is governed by US domestic law and international law is for the other less privileged nations on the planet. This     can be the only reason for the continued assertion of US domestic law or US interpretation of international law when it comes to war crimes of terror acts committed by the current US President and his administration. The sense of impunity enjoyed by the US was evident during genocide carried out on Palestine, when the US’s ally Israel was held accountable, the US sanctioned the people who held up the standards of international law, as a direct retaliation with the US President called for sanctions against   individuals working in  ICC, ICJ and UN. This sense of privilege a feeling that the US law is above international law and the fact that U...