Skip to main content

Anti-Semitism an open-ended Definition, raises questions on Jus Cogens?

 

From the University grounds in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Netherlands, Australia, to the US Senate and more recently the Prime Minister of Canada and others; everyone is passionate about expanding the definition of Anti-Semitism and portraying anyone who dares question Israel’s crimes against Humanity in Gaza as criminals or individuals on the brink of facilitating acts of terror.

Given the tech supremacy in Military Industry with a disproportionate concern for soldiers alongside research on mental health issues among soldiers it is natural, especially among military powers like US and its ally Israel, that robots will be doing more than blowing up buildings as it is doing at present in Gaza. Under such circumstances it is important to analyse what such a definition would mean at the ground level; such an inquiry is relevant at the conceptual level and for global governance.

When students and others stand up against the war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide carried out by Israel on Gaza Palestine, they are asserting the need for protecting the universality of Jus Cogens [1] and its superiority in the hierarchy of laws both international (including treaties) and domestic laws. Yet, the students and others who stand for justice are brutally silenced, either by legal force or by ill-disguised blackmail strategies that include suspension of fellowships or stability as jobs in the present or the future.

But what does such response to legitimate concerns about humanity, communicate logically:

a) It states, Jus Cogens is far from Universal, it is conditional and therefore can be redundant and void.

b) Prohibition against egregious conduct, such as crimes against humanity, genocide, slavery and human trafficking can be selective, influenced by local politics, executive branch of governance, trade agreements between states and by tech and military industrial needs.

c) Anti-Semitism and even expression of discrimination or difference in opinion can be considered to be an egregious conduct, if the victim is a Jew and the victim identifies the act as an egregious one and such identification ensures its default top position and thereby is above any other hierarchy of laws that exist.

4) Expression of solidarity with universality of Jus Cogens should be dealt with force and it can include measure that violate the fundamental rights of those who dare to stand for justice.

5) Hierarchy of law is not about source of law or role of constitution or role of judiciary, it is about the financial power of the Member State and its military strength.

6) When military might is by your side, even Genocide and Crimes against Humanity is Sanctioned. This is best expressed in the pride with which Israel asserts “Destroyed 20 residential blocks in 120 seconds”[1].

7) Be careful of what you choose for the US position after spending over 900 billion on military can be shaky given the scope for imitation military equipment and evolving knowledge of “Hack for Fun and Purpose”. This shift would be an environmental disaster, and natural disasters are immune to politics of power making vulnerability Universal.

8) United States Presidential Executive Orders rule over all else and thus speaking about Jus Cogens is like hitting a carcass to bring back life.

9) The open-ended definition of Anti-Semitism, and harsh, falsely handed out punishment may have the opposite impact than what western establishment intended, Antisemitism which in the past was considered a serious transgression in most instances, is now associated with Government or the Establishment’s desire to wield a strong hand and silence dissent. The meaning of Antisemitism is being diluted in scale and speed.

Reference

1. Jus Cogens : Jus Cogens differs from other norms it is considered mandatory, compels law makers to act in a specific manner. If the provision of a treaty conflicts with an existing Jus Cogens norms, that provision is invalid insofar as it violated Jus Cogens..

For norms to be considered as Jus Cogens its mandatory effect must be universally accepted by international community. The need for universality has restricted it to be prohibition against egregious conduct, such as crimes against humanity, genocide, slavery and human trafficking.

2. Hezbollah couldn't stop the genocide in Gaza :Marwan Bishara ALJazeera English 27/11/2024

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Living in the Margins

 Molly Charles (1) Margin, a term familiar from tender age; notebooks with clear cut margins to delineate the main body of text, define it. The margins give it definite shape, a practice that continues into the virtual world. Among humans, it is these margins that give identity to the large majority we term normal. The often, porous boundaries offer a chance for individuals to slip through and slip back into either ‘normal’ or ‘marginal’ spaces. The decision to identify with marginal groups or positions can be a conscious one as with (gender identity, drug use), enforced as in (mental health, racial and caste based discrimination) and accidental for (drug use, stigmatized diseases). In certain instances, as with mental health, some individuals may find their being part of marginal groups a permanent reality, in most other instances individuals do move in and out of marginal groups, as a survival strategy to deal with marginalization. Even when physical spaces merge, with an emph...

Peace, Security & Fourth Industry, Technology—impact on Us and Our Becoming

                                                                                                                                                   Peace is something everyone can sense, and yet, find difficult to define. Its complexity, and simplicity is reflected in our restricted definition of peace as an absence of war/violence, even though we sense it is far beyond that.    Peace is a concept that exists beyond the boundaries of empirical reality, but we seek it within the realms of empirical reality, where power has the final say. We conceive it as a static state, where a world view palatable to u...

Drugs, Altered States of Consciousness & Us - Implications for Drug Policy

                                                             C enturies have gone by and yet we struggle in our waltz with Mind Altering Substances (MAS), our steps still falter and a probable safe distance evades our grasp. The yesteryears centered around finding mind altering substances in nature, from far and near; now we hone our skills in identifying the right chemicals or the means of manipulating molecular formations for creating MAS within kitchen labs or in the pharmaceutical industry. The presence of numerous substances to choose from has apparently not satiated user demand nor dampened the passion of enforcement agencies to exterminate the 'enemy'. There is an ever widening gap in the perception of MAS by users, numerous sub groups within the larger society, inclusive of enforcers of the Law. Users who adhere to cul...