D.O.G.E or apt alternate full form Drive over Government Efficiently, is it a Terror Agency?

 

Assessment work of any agency has never caught the national and international headline as the terror agency D.O.G.E of Elon Musk, who has no skills in carrying out assessment or evaluation of any agency let alone US Federal Services. He has proved it making a mockery of the process, firing people even before initiating an assessment. In any other country, there would have been mental restraining order against both Elon Musk and the delusional US President Donald Trump.

 It is pathetic to see American ethos fall so low that even a failed state may seem to have some decorum left when considering certain instances that are happening. D.O.G.E is a terror agency, for it is carrying out acts that are criminal and unconstitutional, the President of United States does not have the sanction to transfer a criminal act into a legit one.

According to the Department of Justice, as per even the Patriot Act: Preserving life and liberty, the USA Patriot Act: Preserving Life and Liberty (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism), this act was passed 98-1 by Senate and 357-66 in the House with support from members across the political spectrum.

a) Even under this there are provision made for detecting, arresting or seizing property within agencies. The Act allows law enforcement to use surveillance against more crime of terror, but the process need to indicate the care taken to get evidence or data on crime committed or suspected to be committed. The Act enabled investigators to gather information on terrorism related activities and terrorism financing. But evidence is needed before action is taken.

b) The Act allows federal agents to follow sophisticated terrorists trained to evade detection… the Act authorized agents to seek court permission to use same techniques in national security investigation to track terrorists. But the Court Permission is needed to follow terrorist.

c) The Act allows law enforcement to conduct investigations without tipping off terrorists. In certain cases, if criminals are tipped off too early to an investigation, they might flee, destroy evidence, intimidate or kill witnesses, cut off contact with associates, or take action to evade arrest. Therefore, federal courts in narrow circumstances have allowed law enforcement to delay for a limited time when the subject is told that a judicially-approved search warrant has been executed. Notice is always provided, but the reasonable delay gives law enforcement time to identity the criminal associates, eliminate immediate threats to our communities, and coordinate arrests of multiple individuals without tipping them off beforehand. These delayed notification search warrants have been used …

But there is need for legal notification and search warrant.

d) The Act allows Federal agents to ask a court for an order to obtain business records in national security terrorism cases. Examining business records often provides the key that investigators are looking for to solve wide range of crimes. Business records and other items are got through grand jury subpoenas, but in national security cases the same process is not appropriate and so under the present Act, the government can ask federal court (the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court) to get access to the records but the federal court issues the order only after the government demonstrates “the records concerned are sought for an authorized investigation to obtain foreign intelligence information not concerning a U.S. Person or to protect against international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities, provided that such investigation of a U.S person is not conducted solely on the basis of activities protected by the First Amendment.

But court permission sought to get records and the government has to prove the investigation is to obtain foreign intelligence information and not concerning a U.S. person,… provided that such investigation of a U.S person is not conducted solely on the basis of activities protected by First Amendment.

If these are the provision for investigating terrorism, how is that D.O.G.E can barge into agencies independent or government without adhering to legal provision take over government property or other business records and even get Police and F.B.I to support such criminal acts. Isn’t there a law in US that states destruction of government property is a War Crime, if so, forceful take over and removal of locks or its destruction and replacement, isn’t this a War Crime.

Mr. President of United States, Donald Trump, Mr. Elon Musk and his team are carrying out act of terror, for D.O.G.E is terrorizing professionals in name of assessment or evaluation, it is without giving notice firing people or threatening them, seizing documents, changing the access process, destroying federal services by making it dysfunctional and most of all when people assert their rights and that of their agency, D.O.G.E team are using force amounting to war crimes and acts of terror. They are using measures not even given to law agencies and others even under the Patriot Act, all in the name of evaluation or assessment of Federal Services to detect Fraud and Corruption.

 Molly Charles