Western Media has been directly responsible for narrative that made Israel and US so embolden that they thought Genocide of Palestinian is sanctioned. After continuous criticism from concerned audience across the globe, the Western media has been trying to be “professional” by stating “Palestinian Killed by Israeli forces” and not as it would earlier state “Palestinians dead after Israeli forces attack buildings” as though the great moral Israel was just bombing the suspected buildings and for no rhyme or reason these ignorant Palestinian human beings were hanging around and happened to die. Recent events indicate, the change may be to be only skin deep.
Recently the DWnews had an expert
from Human Rights Watch speak about how children aged 12 and above are being
used for questionable supportive roles in the military by Iran. Before dwelling
into this specific I would just like to point out why no one speaks of Israel
radicalising children from being a toddler for life, a radicalisation that led
to Genocide and them having trending songs praising genocide, even acceptance
of rape of Palestinians and their murder.
How many more Genocide would it
take for the Western media to be, not even just, but at least fair and human.
An analysis of DWnews Video
titled “Iran expands war effort with child recruitment, Human Rights Watch
warns”
1. The reporter points out that
Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is recruiting minors for
checkpoint duties. Patrols and other supportive activities. According to Human
Rights Watch, children as old as 12 is being recruited for training in
supportive roles. Israel that has snipper shot children in the eye, head, chest
and stomach at times more than one shot at the same spot so much so the brain
spills out, these Israelis are stating that because Iranian children are being
trained in supportive roles at check points they might be accidentally get killed, this worries Israel. Nothing
but a ploy for Israel to have an excuse in advance for killing Iranian children.
Seriously, DWnews how much will
you bend over backwards to please Israel and their support agency Human Rights
Watch.
Israeli Schools
By the way, in case DWnews and
HRW experts did not know, Israel deeply integrates military orientation into
its school’s system from primary schooling, toddlers are conditioned to Israeli
Flag and identity and they proudly display the same. The best part is no where
in the school curriculum is Palestine mentioned as a neighbouring country, the
very young speak openly about taking over Palestinian land by force for it
belongs to Israel. Has any Western Country even spent a moment to wonder when
occupation of Palestinian land is taught as a legal right to Israeli children
and Palestinian are despised how can these children ever grow up to be
individual who seek peace in the region.
A pic from social media for
illustration, by the way earlier Israel used to proudly display on social
media, children as young as 3 and 4 years hold flags bigger than them welcoming
military personnel for interaction with them. Please note being biased towards
Israel has created the genocide which is still continuing.
It is pathetic to watch the blatant manipulation that is happening, the reporter makes a face to show disbelief and contempt when stating “does children being in support group change legal or moral concerns”. HRW expert are you trying to state that children would be seen as an asset in real active war areas, when actually they would be liability and they are not big enough for a human shield.
Iran knows from Israel’s action
in Palestine, Lebanon and Iran that Israeli soldiers have scant sentiments
towards any children in the region other than Israeli children. The Israeli
leader and soldiers have made it clear that “Children are future combatants and
so their death is a preventive strategy. Please stop the hogwash of caring for
Iranian children. I can prove it to you, your concern is nothing but hogwash,
below I analyse HRW’s report of your investigation on bombing of school in
Iran, titled “US/Israel: Investigate Iran School Attack as a War Crime”
a) At the beginning in the report
it is stated loud and clear “The United States and Israel should immediately
assess their responsibility for this attack and make the findings public. The
responsible party should fully account for the civilians’ harm and hold those
responsible accountable, including prosecuting anyone responsible for war
crimes.
Within this context is it fair to
trust the same State, Israel, which knew soldiers were responsible for raping a
Palestinian in full view and then he became so ill that he had to receive
immediate medical attention, but the public protested in Israel stating Israeli
soldiers (all these are documented at times by Israeli themselves and put up on
social media) have right to rape or murder Palestinian prisoners. After a
“trial” the court set them free saying there is no proof of the soldiers having
done anything wrong. This State, Israel, will investigate itself on its role in
“Killing the School Children”.
Then comes the role of US,
specifically the role of US President, Soldiers and tech companies. The
President of US was so sensitive that he did not blame technical error, he said
in his great wisdom, Iran itself killed the children. You expect a professional
fair report from US that has evidently gone Rogue under President Trump.
b) After initial attempt to be objective the
report systematically dilutes the process of holding US and Israel accountable.
Oh Great HRW, the actual
evaluation needed is the Missile used, its technological accuracy, methods of
verification, the visual accuracy, here for tomahawk which is about 1 meter
(thus limiting the scope for compound scenario details actually making a
difference in target selection and locking), the technology used, which makes
children legitimate target, this technology was decided upon way ahead of any
war for making a child a legitimate target, there would be need for clear
instruction as the physical profile of children are very different from adults,
there would have been need for a educational scenario being a legitimate target
as well. This would mean besides, US service personnel of the field, the US
administration and technology agencies, the military contractors and mediators
all of whom were involved in product design, finalization, marketing and sale
are responsible.
The Process of dilution of the
report:
1) Focusing on
scope disparity in number of children killed, forgetting in Germany, US and
Israel and generally in most part of the world, it is three or more people in
one location in one instance with no gap in between.
In this context
was there a need to write a long paragraph on how it was difficult to count
exact number of children murdered, their age and their names. As though this
diluting was not enough the paragraph ends with focus on a different topic
“Human Rights Watch is also investigating Iranian forces’ strikes on targets in
countries in the Middle East”. Have some shame after all it was mass murder of
school children, even though you may not like their race or ethnicity.
Next you go
into description of the Scenario trying to put doubt in reader’s mind and also
give a loop for Israel and US and Israel to escape. The report mentions the
school close to or adjacent to Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Naval
Forces compound (please note such a location is not indicated in the google map
taken on 2nd April at 1.25 am IST).
There is
another issue as per the information on definition of Naval Forces Compound, it
typically refers to a secured onshore installation, base, or facility that
serves as a headquarters, support centre or training ground for nation’s naval
forces. It has to be by the sea or at maximum distance of 1000 meters or 1Km.
The problem is Minab where school is 25 Kilometres from sea and so certainly
not a place to find Naval Forces Compound of IRGC or any other agency.
There are two
maps provided in the report one which is not very clear from google map, which
shows the school is located at a corner close to street with the so called
Naval Forces Compound adjacent but at a distance. But, at the same time the
other map shows Naval Force Compound behind it at a corner is the school. This
difference is not because of angle of shot taken, there is total change in
orientation of the two entities, the school and alleged Naval Forces Compound.
Both the
Maps for references, the specific location highlighted.
Below is the image I took, this gives very different scenario, according to google map there isn’t any IRGC Naval Forces Compound there. There two small lanes separating the school from the alleged location IRGC Naval Forces Compound. Apparently, there is some confusion generated from different maps, this should be avoided, for this what Israel often opt for to create a narrative shift and impunity from war crimes or terror acts.
2) The report further goes into stretching all possibility to blame the victim, here Iran and reduce the burden on Israel and US. Some the statement that dilutes and blames the victim country Iran, “the extent to which the facilities were in use for military purposes at the time of attack, and what may have been stored there was not immediate apparent. If any of the facilities within the compound were used for military purposes, Iranian authorities would appear to have been placing civilians at unnecessary risk and therefore also would have been in violation of the laws of war”. The exact nature how IRGC Naval Forces Compound became a military complex later is not indicated but is relevant as both have very different, focus, scale, strength of personnel and most of all military is a nation’s force and Guard Corps, a special unit for specific purpose.
3) Hilarious
aspect of the report, apparently the report looked at data for 25 years, how
structural changes occur within military complex. There is no indication of how
data on IRGC alleged presence in the area and presenting 10-year-old reference
material on changes in the scenario of the spot and adjacent area where the
school was located using that data to contribute towards analysis of problem or
question in hand.
What is the purpose of this when the present
technology is precision based, focused on time, current location and speed. What was there yesterday also does not matter
for there are 4 approaches for target testing for the Tomahawk missile and last
one is almost immediately before the target is locked in. Under such
circumstances, why take readers for a ride, all towards trying to blame Iran,
indicating even in the report that undated photo published in 2025 shows a sign
with IRGC logo and the word for “barrack” or “unit”.
Hoodwinking
the Reader!
The report is
very professional but in a very subtle manner ensures to hoodwink the reader.
The ways in which they do that:
a) Focusing on
the number of children died, whether it was 25 or 168, writing 3 or 4 paras of
the same
b) Focusing on
the structural scenario, even getting historical data for 25 years, through the
process directly and indirectly focusing on it being a military complex, each
time ensuring association gets stronger.
c) Repeating
again and again the point that Iran is in violation of laws of war, or “ for it
would appear Iranian authorities have been placing civilians at unnecessary
risk”.
d) Focusing on
the graves dug, when it was dug and where the number of graves where less than
168 or 100
e) Totally
ignoring the actual problem to be investigated, and mentioning it on and off
within different paragraphs in the text, there was need to focus on a few simple queries: who targeted the
missile at the school children? Was it targeted? Was there scope for technical
error? What data is there to give explanation as to the role of US and Israel?
DWNews your
take on Iran recruitment, My take on the same
Based on the
analysis of the report from HRW on the Missile attack on School in Minab Iran, why
would one expect an impartial assessment from HRW. Besides, there is no way HRW
would be going to Iran for ground field data collection, and would be totally
dependent on online data. Given the fact the Israelis are masters at creating
AI manufactured visuals, often as good as real, why would anyone believe all
the digitally available data.
DWNews, shouldn’t
there be an attempt to understand- How did Israeli society become so Genocidal,
that they take pride in their world view and action? How can this extent of radicalisation be
changed for peace in the region? Will Israel see a future beyond Greater
Israel.
Molly Charles
Comments
Post a Comment