Skip to main content

IAEA, if you can’t be Just or Impartial in your assessment, then be silent!

Since no one is willing to bell the cat, I am doing it. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and its representatives are not being governed by truth but rather by what is palatable to the United States and Israel. IAEA has been after Iran not directly, but mentioning grey areas of concerns and how  Uranium enrichment from 60 percent to nuclear arms grade product can be done in short time. All concerns seem legitimate on surface, but let’s look at the layered reality that make up the surface.

Countries that have nuclear War Heads and their reality

Other than the originator of nuclear weapon in 1945, the United States; eight other countries acquired the technology and went ahead and weaponised the same as part of national security approach. These countries are Russia (1949), UK (1952), France (1960), China (1964), India (1974), Pakistan (1998), North Korea (2006) and Israel (1967). Not a single country declared to IAEA in advance their plans to enrich Uranium, it was declared after creating nuclear war head. Since, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) came into existence on July 29, 1957, all countries other than Russia and United Kingdom should have sought the permission of IAEA before starting the process or indicated the decision to start looking at nuclear energy as an option for civil energy. The use of nuclear energy for civil purposes was identified in 1950’s and a nuclear plant set up in USA in 1951 and in USSR by 1954. But none of the countries that enriched did it for solely for civil purpose, the goal to weaponize Uranium was central to the search for nuclear option.

Iran an Exemption

The West has always been suspicious of Iran, for unlike many other countries in the region it has never been willing to be trained by West as to reflect what is convenient and palatable to the West. Israel is the country that has nuclear war head from 1967, a country which almost out of habit bombs its neighbours with false claims of security concerns, it may be far more for Israelis to remember the long- term plan for Greater Israel. Israel has never opened it nuclear facilities for inspection, in fact it makes some provisions for checking by IAEA officials, almost as though Israel, which is above international law, is providing some evidence of its nuclear energy out of its benevolence. Not a word from any Western country about this blatant privilege status enjoyed by Israel. Probably, scared Israel will accuse them of being antisemitic!

West, take a breath and for a moment look at a different reality. A reality where Ayatollah Ali Khamenei meant what he stated with regard to the Fatwa on developing nuclear war heads as it is against wishes of Allah. This is easy to understand, for he was a long-term thinker and planner as evident from how Iran has destroyed powerful, advanced, lethal American war equipment through comparatively cheap weapons, strategies to deplete American resources and at the same time ensuring its limited impact. This war strategy implementation happed after the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader but has been in place decades ago, as evident from Iran’s capacity replenish it war heads. For a strategist and religious leader like Ayatollah Ali Khamenei use of nuclear warhead in current capacity is a foolish option, for there is no strategy needed and it would destroy not just humans, animals but all living beings and ensure germination of life remains a tough call.

The West, really never understood his capacity to think across field, with help of others and have a vision for future.  Because, if the vision was absent, there wouldn’t be such great hackers or excellent trolls. The West may have gone out of their way to discredit Iran’s trolls, but isn’t it that a statement that Iran won war of thought in the Lego world.

In the future nuclear warhead may not be the choice to portray power, for given the environmental reality of our planet, nuclear blast might not leave any winner. Any person who is capable of having a pragmatic vision into future would understand that, it may be far more relevant to have an army of white hackers, they would be able to achieve goal without major environmental disasters.

Oh, West, it may be comforting to have a set perception of Iran, but that is not reality. It is evident if one were to look at their scientific research be it in nano technology (top 4-7 countries), bio technology and stem cell research (ranks 2nd in the world), ranks 4th in infertility treatment, pioneering work in oncology, regenerative medicine, pharmaceutical production, engineering, artificial intelligence and Plasma research. Iran had an advantage which none other have; restricted, stifled and discarded as trifle by sanctions Iran learnt to make indigenous products and compete for world standards, which means they are less dependent on others.

Iran has the right to nuclear energy; Israel nor US has any moral or ethical right to decide the future of Iran. Iran is a country that stated up front in 2001 that it plans to enrich Uranium, they need not have stated so, they could have done what other countries did. It is high time IAEA, if it has any ethics left appreciated what Iran has done and stopped putting a veil on what Israel and the US are doing.

Israel has carried on a genocide, bombed countries at will, used phosphorous with no questions asked, ensured the US bombed nuclear facility of Iran because it felt Iran could be a security risk for Israel. Then Israel and the US went ahead and assassinated nuclear scientist, this is not new. From 2010 to 2020, five nuclear scientists were killed either through car bombing or shooting. Fereydoon Abbasi who survived an assassination in 2010, was murder on 13th June,2025.  

To get the real picture, it may be useful to recollect that on 13th June 2025, during simultaneous strikes on Iran, many scientist were assassinated by Israel, let’s recollect their name. Scientists who were assassinated by simultaneous strikes on Tehran were Fereydoon Abbasi (Former Vice President of Iran and Head of Atomic Energy Organization, expert in nuclear engineering; Seyyed Amir Hossein Feghhi, full professor at Shahid Beheshti University, deputy of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, expert in Physics; Akbar Motalebizadeh, Faculty member at Shahid Behesti University, nuclear engineer and expert in chemical engineering; Mohammad Mehdi Tehranchi, President of the Islamic Azad University expert in physics; Saeed Borji, Expert in materials engineering; Mansour Asgari, expert in Physics; Ahmadreza Zolfaghari Daryani, Professor of nuclear engineering at Shahid Beheshti University, expert in nuclear engineering and nuclear physics; Ali Bakhouei Katirimi, expert in mechanics; Abdolhamid Minouchehr, nuclear physicist and nuclear engineer, head of nuclear engineering at Shahid Beheshti University. In the same month, three other scientists were assassinated, Isas Tabatabai-Qamsheh, nuclear engineer; Mohammad Rezasedighi Saber, nuclear engineer, head of the organization of Defensive innovation and Research, Shahid Karimi Group; and Hossein Zaki Dizaji, Nuclear engineer professor at Imam Hossein University.

In spite of the war crimes, acts against humanity, carried out by United States, not once has the US or Israel been asked about these crimes. Why?

The actual truth, Israel is a security risk for all countries in the region. It is high time there is a complete and total assessment of Israel as a nuclear power.

IAEA you are biased because…

You state again and again that Iran has enriched uranium 65 percentage at the same time you do not have any evidence it is planning to make a nuclear warhead. If Iran wanted to it could have made nuclear warheads and then declared to the world just like eight other countries did, IAEA you can’t have special rules and duties for Iran and none for other countries. The US President has put out a Presidential Executive Order stating how he plans for further nuclear research which includes for military and civil purposes. In my last post I mentioned this and gave a link, now the Presidential Executive Order has been changed, now there are number of Presidential Executive Orders with regard to Nuclear Energy, with most of them highlighting civil energy use and military use mentioned in passing, if one care to look for details. Apparently, the US Presidential Executive Orders are like the Israel’s Constitution always in a flux with nothing static to be held accountable for!

Both the US and Russia are way ahead than other countries in nuclear research and have simulation in place to do further military research. Even then it has been indicated that at times it is useful to have certain amount of enriched uranium, and probably for this US will be enriching Uranium or may it will again try to steal it Iran. In this context, how will IAEA ensure US adheres to any provision made under international law.

Past two years has been a clear indication that the United States is not a country to be trusted to handle nuclear weapons diligently, as the power of final decision largely rests on the President of United States. Currently reality test indicates American Democracy has its quality totally based on the personality of the President. The US President Trump has made it clear he will override all other branches of governance and set in rules in line with his own morality, be it disconnected from domestic or international laws. Yet, IAEA, sees no concern with regard to the United States.

Where were you regarding the rights of Iran when US invaded and bombed its nuclear facility, after IAEA hinted it was not satisfied with the inspection. How come you never came out to hold the US or Israel accountable for the attacks on facility, when you know you may have directly or indirectly given the feeling there are lot of grey areas about nuclear facility in Iran and that gave the US and Israel a sense they can use force or bomb Iran to make it comply international dictate of the US and Israel.

Israel is ruling the region as though it’s the Mafia and everyone listens to it, the only power that stood up against it and forced or ensured justice is Iran. But that is not the only issue for Israel, it knows the scope for Iran to be viable, cost- effective competition in many areas of development in future, that is bad for business as far as Israel is concerned. It is also bad for long term plans for Greater Israel. It is not possible the US is so dense that it cannot see the stark reality and games of Israel, it must be very much part of long-term strategies of Israel.

IAEA Professionals you are not dense, so stop pretending to be and hold Israel and US accountable, just because the United States is the major funder and dictates some of the functioning including how countries are to held accountable and which to be given preference for, does not mean IAEA forgets all its goals. Please don’t even bother to say IAEA is not biased, then how come the literature on nuclear proliferation hardly mentions Israel, the main country with unaccounted nuclear warheads in the Middle East. The only country that keeps dropping bombs on neighbours as though they are toys for entertainment, a country so distant from humanity, that sniper shots on toddlers is also part of their game.

According to IAEA statement the purpose of its creation is to ensure nuclear material is not used for military purpose, does it also state the United States and Israel are exempted?

Sanctions can’t be selective!

Rights for all or for none!

Molly Charles

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Peace, Security & Fourth Industry, Technology—impact on Us and Our Becoming

                                                                                                                                                   Peace is something everyone can sense, and yet, find difficult to define. Its complexity, and simplicity is reflected in our restricted definition of peace as an absence of war/violence, even though we sense it is far beyond that.    Peace is a concept that exists beyond the boundaries of empirical reality, but we seek it within the realms of empirical reality, where power has the final say. We conceive it as a static state, where a world view palatable to u...

The President of US stands accused of Genocidal intent?

Mr.President Trump, after hinting at his intent for days, now allegedly has stated loud and clear he would like to own another sovereign state, Palestine and wants to remove the entire population of Palestinians from there. For which he is bidding with nations in the middle east, almost creating a new form of slave trade.  The President of US standa accused of:  a) Clearly expressed Genocidal intent, expressed to entire world totally in free will, standing in a position of power as the greatest spender on Military industry.  2. As specified in Article two of genocide convention he state he wants to destroy an entire nation by erasing its existence and using organised crime methods for the same.  3.Totally against the UN charter Article 2 (4) for it "prohibits use of force (which could be physical and psychological) and calls on all Members to respect the Sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of other states.  4. Whether US and Israel want...

Living in the Margins

 Molly Charles (1) Margin, a term familiar from tender age; notebooks with clear cut margins to delineate the main body of text, define it. The margins give it definite shape, a practice that continues into the virtual world. Among humans, it is these margins that give identity to the large majority we term normal. The often, porous boundaries offer a chance for individuals to slip through and slip back into either ‘normal’ or ‘marginal’ spaces. The decision to identify with marginal groups or positions can be a conscious one as with (gender identity, drug use), enforced as in (mental health, racial and caste based discrimination) and accidental for (drug use, stigmatized diseases). In certain instances, as with mental health, some individuals may find their being part of marginal groups a permanent reality, in most other instances individuals do move in and out of marginal groups, as a survival strategy to deal with marginalization. Even when physical spaces merge, with an emph...