Skip to main content

UN, you are a shame to Humanity! You gave your floor to rewrite the narrative with an American edge!

 UN the world may hold a torch to the fading light of the US and its unprincipled Gulf partner countries who are not just morally but directly responsible for the US and Israel attacks not just on Uranium enrichment sites, but planned attack on Supreme Leader of Iran and his family, massacre of Iranian scientists and their families, massacre of 158 or more school children. If even a small percentage of violation had happened to the US or Israel, the world would be watching massacres unfold across countries with the explanation of pre-emptive strikes. Not one once did these Gulf countries come in full force to hold US accountable, how could they for without their permission to use the US bases and their air space no bombing would have happened. They are complicit, degree may wary!

Just imagine the inhumanity you are showing UN, have you shown such inhumanity and injustice to any other country. Now you let them speak as though Iran is responsible for all the weaponization of the Strait of Hormuz.

1. Prior to March 4th when Iran blocked transit through Strait of Hormuz, Iran was bombed by US and Israel, using US bases as per need, on 28TH February, 1st March, 2nd March, 3rd March, and on 4th March.  It was proudly called Epic Fury by the Rogue US President, who has made bombing his pastime for entertainment and every one cajoles him for the same. Through Epic Fury prior to blocking of Strait of Hormuz by Iran, 1000 places were bombed  in 150 cities, this included military bases, and residential area, university, schools, educational institutes, research institutes, oil refinery, oil warehouses, sport complex while practice was going on,  planned attack on residential location of intelligentsia. The country had to face all this along with loss of their Spiritual Leader, his family and many of top military leaders.

Under which international law or US domestic Law are such acts acceptable. Of course, the spineless US Congress has taken the easy way out of stating for 60 days the US President can do what he wills and after that he will be held accountable. Is the UN and UNSC fine with such arrangement for a member state and a prominent power base within UNSC and a country that UN and UNSC considers to be a democracy?

For a simple murder a person is held accountable with 24 hrs of getting evidence, here even after months has UNSC asked can a democracy function the way the US has been in Palestine, Iran, Venezuela, Somalia, Nigeria and Cuba?

How is this in line with basic philosophy of UN Charter, or is it that the Charter is applicable only to the weak nations?

With regard to crimes carried out by the US, there is no need for proof, the President of the US gloats over his terror act on live TV and religiously posts details of all his acts, at times with visuals as evidence, on Truth Social. If UN is unable to ask a country to stop mass murder across countries what is the purpose of UN?

2. It is interesting to note that the Ambassador of US speaks about upholding rule of law while the US President has made it clear he does not believe in International Law or Domestic Law but only in his sense of morality whatever it may be. Mr. Ambassador Mike Waltz as you recited the various conventions and agreement, it caught my attention you seem to have forgotten a minor fact, that the US has not ratified the United Nations Convention of Law of Sea and it did so on grounds of sovereignty. To be more specific the US wants to be sole authority to decide the scale and extent of mining of resources from the sea. I assume this fact must have slipped your mind.

Mr. Ambassador, please let me share some other minor facts which you may have ignored, US President Trump through his Presidential Executive Order 14285 (April, 2025), “Unleashing America’s Offshore Critical Minerals and Resources”, asserted the US right to permit mining on its Continental Shelf and in international waters (Area beyond National Jurisdiction). The President’s unilateral approach bypasses UN Convention on the Law of Sea, which anyway the US has refused to adhere to. Please be careful, when you come to UN platform and declare about other nation’s non-adherence or your nation’s adherence to international law.

3. UN, how can US go around sanctioning any country or professional it feels like, including UN’s own. If you consider sanction were or are legitimate, why is the US or Israel never sanctioned, at least as a matter of principle, for they have invaded countries and carried out terror acts than any terror group managed till date. Actually, there may be many terror groups that would be in awe of US President for his ability dance through acts of serious aggressions, war crime and terror acts.

Not a soul dares tell it loud, he is nothing but a terrorist and a rogue, at least that is what his actions indicate legally!

Rights for all, or Rights for none.

Molly Charles

 

Reference

On You tube, United Nations, “Strait of Hormuz Draft Resolution- Joint Media Stakeout

https://youtu.be/keHDGa1Z0Bo?si=VXXG4A_8sTJ4Bbwc

 

 

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Peace, Security & Fourth Industry, Technology—impact on Us and Our Becoming

                                                                                                                                                   Peace is something everyone can sense, and yet, find difficult to define. Its complexity, and simplicity is reflected in our restricted definition of peace as an absence of war/violence, even though we sense it is far beyond that.    Peace is a concept that exists beyond the boundaries of empirical reality, but we seek it within the realms of empirical reality, where power has the final say. We conceive it as a static state, where a world view palatable to u...
Post a Comment
Read more

The President of US stands accused of Genocidal intent?

Mr.President Trump, after hinting at his intent for days, now allegedly has stated loud and clear he would like to own another sovereign state, Palestine and wants to remove the entire population of Palestinians from there. For which he is bidding with nations in the middle east, almost creating a new form of slave trade.  The President of US standa accused of:  a) Clearly expressed Genocidal intent, expressed to entire world totally in free will, standing in a position of power as the greatest spender on Military industry.  2. As specified in Article two of genocide convention he state he wants to destroy an entire nation by erasing its existence and using organised crime methods for the same.  3.Totally against the UN charter Article 2 (4) for it "prohibits use of force (which could be physical and psychological) and calls on all Members to respect the Sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of other states.  4. Whether US and Israel want...
Post a Comment
Read more

Living in the Margins

 Molly Charles (1) Margin, a term familiar from tender age; notebooks with clear cut margins to delineate the main body of text, define it. The margins give it definite shape, a practice that continues into the virtual world. Among humans, it is these margins that give identity to the large majority we term normal. The often, porous boundaries offer a chance for individuals to slip through and slip back into either ‘normal’ or ‘marginal’ spaces. The decision to identify with marginal groups or positions can be a conscious one as with (gender identity, drug use), enforced as in (mental health, racial and caste based discrimination) and accidental for (drug use, stigmatized diseases). In certain instances, as with mental health, some individuals may find their being part of marginal groups a permanent reality, in most other instances individuals do move in and out of marginal groups, as a survival strategy to deal with marginalization. Even when physical spaces merge, with an emph...
Post a Comment
Read more