Skip to main content

Marco Rubio and US President, now realise there is something called International Law and insists they uphold its relevance!

 Seriously, Mr. Marco Rubio, Secretary of State, the world knows there exists The Law of the Sea and it is the international legal framework governing all rights, duties, and jurisdictions of states in maritime environment. But, may be US does not understand its existence for though it mobilized the globe to create it, the US is not a party to the Law of the Sea or United Nations Conventions on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Want to speak on its adherence by nations, Secretary of State, then be a Party to Law of the Sea!

Marco Rubio respects international law for all nations, except that the US is exempted from adherence, for that’s the American way of Democracy!

When US President set the trend for American Democracy to include as strategy, bombing fishermen in international water and killing around 145 people, Mr. Marco Rubio, what happened to international law or even specifically the Law of the Sea.

Marco Rubio, your President carried out Mass Murder and claimed responsibility for same with pride as though he wore it as medal of honour. Your Congress and SCOTUS were silent; the leader of 900 billon military industry sat in his oval office and took pride in bombing fishing boats to smithereens ensuring no lives were spared to let the tale. Except in one instance, the US President’s favourite method “obliteration” did not work and people who escaped where harassed by your agencies threatening them to be silent. That is the great artwork of American Democracy!

Oh Nations, follow the US, the master who will not be party to Law of the Sea, but insist on dictating to others how to function within its framework!

Marco Rubio, Secretary of State, the US the great American democracy, what happened to international law when Israel and US assassinated the Supreme leader of Iran along with his family, as though that was not enough military leaders, intelligentsia, scientists all were assassinated with their families. Was the international law put to sleep at the oval office?

Marco Rubio Secretary of State, the US the great American democracy, what happened when Tomahawk missile, US military product mass murdered Iranian School children, was the international law still asleep at the oval office? Please don’t say technical error, there is no scope for that when the missile is highly advance can hit a target 1,000 miles away and is marketed for its visual accuracy, said to be at a few meters.

Mr. President Donald Trump, Tomahawk missiles are produced and assembled in Tucson, Arizona, by Raytheon. Sorry, Mr. President, Tomahawk missiles are used by naval force of two countries, the USA and the UK. Are your trying to state that the UK out of the bloom, decided to bomb Iran and at the very right time as the US were bombing Iran. Mr. President, if you want to destroy the truth by planting doubt about narrative, please find a more subtle way.

Irony is that the decision to let school children be an acceptable target was not decided by the AI and not just by the IDF soldier who made the final call, it was also considered acceptable by the CEOs of the tech companies involved in its manufacture both soft and hardware. The staff who were part of conceptualising and finalizing the product, the marketing team all played a role to ensure 145 school children could be butchered, without a tinge of guilt.

Oh! Nations follow the US, which adheres to no international law and takes all measures to protect Israel, a country that has made dropping bombs as a side entertainment and taking sniper shots at children from different angles only to market its products for accuracy in any circumstance and even when target, is small and difficult to predict.

Marco Rubio Secretary of State, is the President aware that you consider UN has a role to play in international governance. Your stated faith in UN is strange, for the US has sanctioned professionals for doing their jobs at ICC and UN.

Marco Rubio Secretary of State, does the US think that entire global suffers form short term memory loss and any narration from the US would be accepted as the best option to build a global narrative in line with the US expectation?

Marco Rubio, Secretary of State isn’t such expectations a bit unrealistic.

Yes, Marco Rubio Secretary of State, international law matters to all nations, except to the US, Israel and their supporters!

Sovereignty for all or for None!

Molly Charles

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Peace, Security & Fourth Industry, Technology—impact on Us and Our Becoming

                                                                                                                                                   Peace is something everyone can sense, and yet, find difficult to define. Its complexity, and simplicity is reflected in our restricted definition of peace as an absence of war/violence, even though we sense it is far beyond that.    Peace is a concept that exists beyond the boundaries of empirical reality, but we seek it within the realms of empirical reality, where power has the final say. We conceive it as a static state, where a world view palatable to u...

The President of US stands accused of Genocidal intent?

Mr.President Trump, after hinting at his intent for days, now allegedly has stated loud and clear he would like to own another sovereign state, Palestine and wants to remove the entire population of Palestinians from there. For which he is bidding with nations in the middle east, almost creating a new form of slave trade.  The President of US standa accused of:  a) Clearly expressed Genocidal intent, expressed to entire world totally in free will, standing in a position of power as the greatest spender on Military industry.  2. As specified in Article two of genocide convention he state he wants to destroy an entire nation by erasing its existence and using organised crime methods for the same.  3.Totally against the UN charter Article 2 (4) for it "prohibits use of force (which could be physical and psychological) and calls on all Members to respect the Sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of other states.  4. Whether US and Israel want...

Living in the Margins

 Molly Charles (1) Margin, a term familiar from tender age; notebooks with clear cut margins to delineate the main body of text, define it. The margins give it definite shape, a practice that continues into the virtual world. Among humans, it is these margins that give identity to the large majority we term normal. The often, porous boundaries offer a chance for individuals to slip through and slip back into either ‘normal’ or ‘marginal’ spaces. The decision to identify with marginal groups or positions can be a conscious one as with (gender identity, drug use), enforced as in (mental health, racial and caste based discrimination) and accidental for (drug use, stigmatized diseases). In certain instances, as with mental health, some individuals may find their being part of marginal groups a permanent reality, in most other instances individuals do move in and out of marginal groups, as a survival strategy to deal with marginalization. Even when physical spaces merge, with an emph...