Redefining Concept of Terrorism, US President Trump? Epic Fury as Exquisite Platform Military business model demolished by cost effective options, for good, by Iran?

Terrorism is the most powerful concept; it has been manipulated to evolve selectively as to silence critical thought that jar with the frame created by influential elite and institutions they govern. It is powerful, because it is diverse, vague and at times selectively used as per convenience and what is conducive to the present body of knowledge. This in itself creates a situation where it is evidently a force used to ensure, sovereignty is not a right or a given for any country but something that US may not hinder, if their President’s ego is pampered enough. The role of US government in deciding the scope for sovereignty of another nation is not recent, but the passion with which the current President Trump breaks all domestic and international laws in the name of ill-conceived fallacies, and the ferocity of his right to impunity that exists far more within his mind than in reality, is new.

What increases the scale of this madness is that it is business model of governance, conceived by a few, with all the soft power needed to manage humans, for we provided data to weaponize it against ourselves through Anthropic and other similar programs. We gave our data for speed and convenience, and paid for it too. Now, the digital mega planners the tech corporates have different spheres of influence they want to evolve and manage across the globe. For the first causality, a must, is the sovereignty of nations, this is a threat far beyond what any communist model can imagine, a form of tech-based slave society and Mr. US President is in the process of developing a blue print for the same.

Doubt my words read on, this is no conspiracy theory but just a conclusion based on frequent use of deduction, induction, conceptual analysis, content categorisation, final induction and deduction. Very simple, and straight forward.

Trump Style of International relations based on terror strategy

There is never a question about illegality of a nation’s sovereign rights being shaped by another nation, but here it has gone even far beyond that, here is it one individual US President Donald. J. Trump who has made it amply clear; logic, law both domestic and international, institutes of international law or governance, rationality in dealing with arms, diplomacy, decency in interaction, gender sensitivity, stability in action, clarity on and adherence to a decision taken, concepts of justice, equity and equality; all of these are irrelevant to him as a President and as a person. It is this individual through his Presidential Executive Orders who decides the process to govern the US as he per his will and command, and also the world.

When silent acceptance is the norm, there is a danger, for it can evolve and it can create a state of numb acceptance whereby the concept can change drastically in front of our eyes, yet we may not notice it. At present it is almost like across cultures and political ideologies we have begun to share a common form of being blindsided. This blindsided reality if not addressed can be a safe space for vested interest group to play within both at domestic and international levels to create parallel power structure. This and mere fact that blindsided reality may slowly erode the confidence of people at large in the systems of governance, its relevance and ethicality, is concerning.

The Presence of contradiction in word and action

Review of literature indicate different definitions for terrorism, often the domestic definition may be very different from international definition. Within the US, FBI has two different definitions for terrorism, one for international reality and another for domestic. According to FBI international terrorism is defined as “Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals or groups who are inspired by, or associated with, designated foreign terrorist organisation or nations (state sponsored)”. This extended definition of terrorism at the international level, gives the freedom for FBI to keep increasing the number of individuals and entities it considers to be terrorist as per perception of US or rather the US President, at the time. There is no focus on context or causes, it is almost as though from vacuum individuals or groups suddenly decide to become a terrorist and go on a killing spree.

In case of domestic terrorism, the definition is “Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influence, such as those of political, religious, social, racial, and environmental nature”. Here there is clear indication of cause or correlating factors could be political, religious, social, racial and environmental in nature [1].

Another definition or set of definitions to be considered are those put forward by United States Institute of Peace in their Teaching Guide [2]. According to U.S. Department of Defence, terrorism is “The calculated use of violence or the threat of violence to inculcate fear, intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious or ideological”.

Definition given FBI cited by USIP is “The unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.

According to C.T.M Drake “Terrorism is the recurrent use or threatened use of politically motivated and clandestinely organized violence by a group, where aim is to influence a psychological target in order to make it behave in a way the group desires”.

US President’s International and domestic Acts of Terror, yet not held accountable?

President Trump assumes part of profile of being a US President is to use threat as and when he pleases and at times to carry them out, just for image management of being the global figure/ “terrorist” not to be crossed. If terrorism means “ The calculated use of threat of violence to inculcate fear” or if it means “Terrorism is recurrent use of or threatened use of politically motivated and clandestinely organized violence” or if terrorism means “The unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government or civilian population” or if it means “Terrorism constitutes the illegitimate use of force to achieve political objectives when innocent people are targeted” [ibid].

If the above statements are true then US President committed acts of terror when he bombed Iran now and, in the past, [4,5]; when he bombed the boats from Venezuela which allegedly carried drugs [6]; when he used excessive force in Minnesota [7]; when he threatened Somalia till they changed their national defence strategy of dealing with groups, when he said his strategy to deal with pirate boats that could come close to tankers was to blow them up [8,9,10]. He also committed act of terrorism whenever he spoke about US Minnesota and its migrant population. Each time the level of threat to the Somalians from the US President and demeaning of individuals from Somalia kept increasing [11].

Taking another instance when after US started bombing Iran in March 2026 the US President stated to the Iranian people “The hour of your freedom is at hand. Stay inside… Bombs will be dropping every where. When we are finished, take over your government, it will be yours to take. This will probably be your only chance for generations… Now you have a (US) President giving you what you want, let’s see how you respond. America is backing you with overwhelming strength and devastating force now is the time to seize control of your destiny and to unleash the prosperous and glorious future that is close within your reach. This is the moment for action do not let it pass [12].

Making it very valid to state the US President is indulging in Stochastic terrorism which refers to repeated use of hate speech or other vilifying, dehumanising rhetoric by a political leader or other public figures that inspires one or more of the figures supporters to commit hate crimes or other acts of violence against a targeted person, group or community [13]. The acts of terrorism and context within which it happens is unpredictable as it is decided upon by the supporters.

When considering the acts of terrorism as per definition carried out US President Trump, there seems to be confusion created as to the rationality for carrying out these acts, especially within domestic reality and also at the international level. Here an attempt is made to looks at a) excessive demeaning of individuals from Somalia and false claims regarding their threat to US the nation and to US government or even white Americans; b) Use of threat on Iran by exaggerating and falsifying the level of threat posed by Iran to the region and the globe; c) US President desired privatised business model for governance and his role in the process

a) US Presidents fixation on Somalia, the probable hidden reason:

The US President has been vocal about his negative perception of Somalians as a population with nothing to substantiate his claims. He has claimed their criminality is a threat to the US and reality indicated they represent a small percentage of US population; there are 500,000 migrants in Minnesota and that is around 8.6 percent of total US population. The number of Somalian migrants is 107,000 for the whole state [14].

In comparison there are over 10 million migrants in California, in Texas there are 6 million migrants, in Florida 5.4 million migrants, in New York 5 million migrants and in New Jersey 2 million migrants [15]. Evidently the number of migrants is lower in Minnesota and Somalians in Minnesota account for a quarter of the total migrant population in the State.

Another point raised by the US President is that “Somalians have come here and taken over the State and have stolen millions and millions of dollars from Minnesota and indeed from USA”. At times he goes further that they are “criminals, drug lords, murders who have infiltrated our country”. Facts state something different, which US President Trump refuses acknowledge; Somalians in Minnesota is a small vibrant community; a significant portion of Somalian population have established a vibrant and rapidly growing entrepreneurial ecosystem; it has evolved from 1994 [16]. This community have small businesses in retail, transportation, health care, financial economy and in restaurants. Unlike the President’s claim of stealing money, they have contributed through the years 8 billion USD towards US economy [17].

Then the President decided to attack Somalia itself, claims that money is being laundered cash being taken by American-Somalians to Somalia which would lead to funding of terrorist groups in Somalia. President Trump has had a tinge at addressing gang issues in Somalia during his last term as President, his focus was to increase air strike but it had limited Impact [18].

The problem of managing the group Al Shabab [19] and second which is splinter of Al Shabab, is far more complex. There is a level of acceptance for these groups especially in the rural areas, especially their governance is reliable, their governance system is replicated from village to national level, with clear hierarchies and accountability systems [20]. They have created a sort parallel government and do address dispute and other issues through Sharia law, at the same time Somali government given limited resources, human and other, are unable to provide a stable relevant governance structure for the area. Given this reality air strikes will not address or limit the problems created by militant groups.

Besides these groups did not emerge from vacuum, Al Shabaab emerged as distinct militant group after Islamic Court of Unions (ICU – coalition of sharia court created to bring order in Somalia) was overthrown by US backed Ethiopian forces that invaded Somalia and took control over many parts of Somalia. Interesting to note that ICU managed to bring out about a semblance of order in mid-2006 they even managed to reopen the airport and seaport. Because ICU implemented strict Sharia law, this probably was not acceptable to US, for it supported the Ethiopian invasion, and Ethiopian forces along Transitional Federal Government managed to oust ICU from power [21]

Evidently, negative peace through tech corporate surveillance, preventive measures such as air strike will never solve the issues confronted by Somalia government. It requires positive peace strategies and for looking for common ground so that the problems of Somalia the ordinary people can be addressed

The US President’s Real interest in Somalia and his excessive demeaning of Somalians in US

What is clear is that Somalia is a land with abundance of natural resources, it has uranium (extremely useful for planned nuclear energy in US), iron ore, tin, gypsum (22 million tons), bauxite, copper, salt and potential oil and natural gas reserves. There is significant potential for natural gas and oil and major exploration efforts in progress. It is useful to note that gypsum is highly relevant to 3D printing in developing high resolution models, molds (used in 3D printing), and architectural components [22].

Mr. US President are you angry with Somalians in US, as they are responsible through their remittance to keep Somalia the country functional. It is estimated that Somalia is heavily dependent on foreign remittances, with an estimated $1.3 to 2 billion sent annually by the diaspora and accounts for at maximum 50 percent of the GDP. It is critical for household consumption, education, healthcare, and investment. These remittances exceed development aid and vital lifeline against poverty. It is more significant than foreign aid and foreign direct investment for the country. It has led to growth of private sectors in telecommunications, banking and construction [23]. This is the main problem for the US President and corporate sectors he supports, for a totally dependent Somalia would be easy to manipulate with regard to access and use of natural resources. It is something similar to what has been done in Venezuela.

b) Bombing of Iran by exaggerating and falsifying the level of threat posed by Iran to the region and the globe

It is ridiculous how US and EU tows the line that nuclear warhead is threat for the region and globe if Iran has it. At the same time Israel has unclear nuclear warhead allegedly 90 nuclear warheads, it carried out a genocide, illegally and criminally occupies land that belong to another nation, it has attacked and invaded or attacked many countries in the region, no other country can compete on this with Israel.

In 2025 Israel attacked six countries Palestine, Iran, Lebanon, Qatar, Syria and Yemen. According to Armed Conflict Location and Event Data (ACLED) from January 1 to December 5 in 2025, Israel carried out 10,631 attacks. It attacked Gaza and the occupied West Bank 8,332 times, it attacked Lebanon 1,653 times, it attacked Iran 379 times, it attacked Syria 207 times, it attacked Yemen 48 times, it attacked Qatar once, Tunisian waters twice, Maltese and Greek waters once each [24].

Yet, Israel is not a source of threat to the region or globe, according to the US and EU. Why?

Iran is considered a great threat even when it does not have the nuclear war head and in fact now even its missiles are a great threat to US. At the same time the number of countries attacked by Iran in 2025, only Israel that too after being attacked and US military base in Qatar. From 2000 to 2025, Iran attacked Israel (after being attacked in 2024 and 2025), it attacked US bases in (Iraq and Qatar), and it attacked in Syria as support for Assad regime. It attacked militant groups in Pakistan, conducted targeted operations in Afghanistan, and bombed Israeli tourists in Bulgaria. Thus in 25 years from 2000 to 2025, Iran attacked 8 countries or support another country in war, instances of act far lower in scale and number, starkly different from the reality of Israel.

If there is no comparison between Iran and Israel with regard to proclivity to indulge in war crimes, then why has sovereignty of Iran been violated as a nation on basis of what Israel states. This is a topic worthy of being explored.

The often-stated fact is that Iran’s plans for nuclear warheads, though it has none, is the threat. At the same time shouldn’t Iran be threatened by a violent Israel capable of Genocide and it having the freedom given by US, Europe and UNSC to bomb at will in the region. Is there another side to these repeated calls of threat regarding Iran.

Logically it would be natural for Iran to seek to have nuclear war heads for it is far more at threat from Israel and US than the other way around. Another factor being a sole nuclear-powered Israel is a permanent threat to the region and will for ever use the West’s complicity, the imagined overstretched antisemitism definition and threat from Iran as a platform to rule the region. One of the powerful road blocks to this ambition of Israel, is Iran and that is a problem for both US and Israel.

Iran needs nuclear energy for a totally different reason, because of energy crisis many of its industries are under functioning or closed. Energy through renewable energy is difficult to scale up because sanctions by US that prevent access to relevant technology and products. It has a small nuclear plant which supplies 1 percent of country’s need.

After sanction for decades by US, Europe and UN, Iran has been forced to innovate and create indigenous alternative and it has been successful in many sectors, military industry, health care, STEM research, genetic research, cancer care, vaccine production, pharmaceuticals and nano technology. Industries across these fields need continued stable base load electric power and this is best provided through nuclear energy. Israel and US would not want cost effective indigenous alternative from Iran as it would be a threat for their business model.

The most threatened is US billion-dollar invincible exquisite platform model of military, a billion-dollar military industry model has taken a hit, especially US military products - billion dollars worth ships and million-dollar jets, designed through years of research to be invincible. Example Northrop B-2 Spirit2_D the most expensive aircraft, the total program cost $44.75 billion for just 21 aircraft [25]. But when expensive missiles worth millions are eliminated by a cheap drone costing thousands of dollars it is a net loss for the US. In the first day of attack on Iran, US has already used up 779-million-dollar worth or arsenal. Thus, the US is adding on to its 36 trillion-dollar national debt, using up expensive billion-dollar military products; especially when the ship has already sailed and invincible and exquisite platform is no longer viable.

America was forced to do reverse engineering of Iranian Shahed -136, to create cost-effective American Shahed. New American product is LUCAS (Low-Cost Uncrewed Combat Attack System. This basically focuses on extensive range thereby allowing it to reach deep into enemy territory, autonomous operation, and launch flexibility it is platform agnostic, it can airborne itself from any location, back of container truck or ship [26,27].

LUCAS was used in Venezuela and Iran; LUCAS is totally autonomous and use AI along with SWARM technology which means chances of so-called technical error in selection of target or scenario (safe zones) for bombing is almost non-existent. In SWARM intelligence it is not one drone but a fleet which keep communicating with each other through AI and Anthropic. So please Mr. President killing of school children in Iran was a confirmed as an option way before the incident. Nice, Mr. President you reverse engineered or copied Iranian Shahed-136 and used it to kill 160 school children while they were at school in Iran.

This is the President who claims to work for human rights and freedom of Iranians.

Mr. President you and your tech corporate military industry must be red for you know work for the exquisite platforms meant years of research and billions of dollars, that meant US was way ahead of others. Now when you shift to cost-effective options and mass production how will your plans for profit through tech based military industry, work. For exquisite products, means a few competitors and open market field across the globe, but with cost-effective options, other countries will have better scope as they can always make it more cost-effective product than US.

Other question that remains what happens when military industry is not able to address national debt. In that case what business sense does it make to fight an imagined threat with billion-dollar equipment as it would mean reduced assets after the tech-based attacks or invasion. When future shift is towards cost-effective options and mass production and work with diverse vendors, then how would this impact on US billion-dollar Military industry.

Decades of sanctions from US, Europe, and UN, meant Iran had to innovate to be relevant and protect its sovereignty. This is what Iran did through the years across sectors not just military industry. In recent times it has developed application through plasma technology for agriculture and industrial use, and its focus is being cost effective [28,29]. While there have been rumours created by US and Israel about weaponizing of plasma technology which seems in line with wanting to attack Iran in one pre-text or another.

In the military industry alternate, cost-effective indigenous products produced by Iran include advanced drones (UAVs) like Shahed-136, and Mohajer are designed to overwhelm air defences. Iran has managed not only to meet its own demand but also supply it to Russia and regional allies. It has produced a wide range of short-and medium-range ballistic and cruise missiles, such as the Fatej-110, Zolfaghar and Kjorranmshahr-4 (range up to 2,000 km). They are also developing hypersonic, solid-fuel, and MIRV (multiple independently targetable re-entry vehicles) technologies. It has fast attack boats, mini-submarines, and indigenous tanks, Zulfiqar [30].

Iran has evolved a military industry, with Iran Electronics Industries (electronics, communications, e-warfare, radars, satellites, etc); Defence Industries organizations (tanks, rockets, bombs, guns, armoured vehicles etc); Aerospace Industries Organization (guided missiles systems etc); Aviation Industries Organization (Aircraft, UAV, helicopters, etc); Marine Industries Organizations (MIO) Ships, hovercraft, submarines, etc.); Organization of Defensive innovation and Research (Defence related research and development); National Geographical Organization of Iran (NGO) Matters related to military maps, national borders and geographical services required by the Armed Forces; Malek-Ashtar University of Technology (The Ministry’s educational institution) [31,32].

Iran has made a successful cost-effective model and Iran has exported to several countries and from March 2022 to March 2023 it sold equipment worth 1 billion USD. Pushed from all sides, Iran had only one option to innovate and focus on self-reliance, indigenous, cost-effective models. This innovation is not restricted to arms industry, it has annual export of 200 million in bio-tech, 500 million knowledge-based export [32]. Iran’s cost-effective model is here to stay, Mr. President the model has already dented the exquisite and invincible model of the US, this was done out of necessity to beat American hegemony and war mongering strategy.

Beyond the Military Industry:

Iran’s standing in scientific research has been consistent, its focus has been to turn scientific research into commercial products. Iran’s key sectors for advancement have been pharmaceutical, construction and agricultural sectors. Iran has emerged as leading country in STEM research, especially in the Islamic world and beyond. It has carried out world class scientific work in Stem Cell Research, Nanotechnology, and Genetic engineering. Iran in ranked 22^nd globally in CRISPR research and 15^th in gene therapy and is 4^th in nano technology in the world. Iran produces 6 percent of world’s nanotechnology articles and it has 294 nanotechnology companies and export products to 45 countries. In 2026, Iran ranked 4^th globally in developing international nanotechnology standards, leading in the publication of 13 international standards.

For all these sector-based industries Iran needs to address its energy, for which Iran needs nuclear energy for stable continues base load electric power for smooth functioning of Iran’s industries.

Evidently, Mr. President the veiled threats perceived by Israel is based on other fears not from security concerns. Israel was to rule as the knowledge base and king across sectors without competition. Israel does want to destroy Iran economically, politically and its development capabilities but it’s not for Israel’s security concerns.

State Support of Iranians

Mr. US President, you make it sound as though Iran is filled with terrorists, who the regime takes care of and all citizens are being used and abused towards the same. Sorry, Mr. President facts indicate a totally different picture, at times far better than what the US citizens can dream of ever achieving.

Health Care

Iran has a heavily subsidized, multi-tiered health care system for its citizens. It aims for universal coverage through Health Transformation Plan. Public hospitals offer care at low rate, but at times patients pay 35 to 55% of the total cost. Iran is one of the few nations providing Universal Public Health Insurance to refugees, offering similar coverage as it does to its citizens [34].

Education

Education is highly subsidized in Iran, primary and secondary education up to age of 15 is free and compulsory. It is funded by the government. For higher education provided through public universities students who pass the national entrance exam “Konkur” can study at State-run-Universities without tuition fee.

Iran provides highly subsidises education in medical, dentistry and pharmacy programs. In medical education the subsidises can cover up to 70 percent of the total cost. Incentives are provided to foreign students as well. Public University fees range from $1000 to $3000 for a year and at times it is lower. In addition, Ministry of Science Research and Technology (MSRT) and Ministry of Health offers fully and partially funded scholarship. These also include subsidized free dormitory accommodation and monthly stipend for living expenses [36]

Mr. President you have been insulting Iran Government for mistreating its citizens, but reality says the students in Iran leave university with a degree and no loans to address at the same time in the US American students pay student loan for life. With regard to gender, the women were encouraged to study and from 2000, more than 50 percent of students who enrolled are women.

Evidently Mr. President, the picture you and West painted of Ayatollah Khamenei was very partial, biased and at times cruel to achieve your goals. It’s the same cruelty that led to you and Israel ensuring death of 150 school children in an all-girls school. Evidently the Iran leader Ayatollah Khamenei did care for his citizens more than what you understood or Iranian diaspora in the US understands [35].

c) US President desired privatised business model for governance and his role in the process

US Presidents have through the years, intervened explicitly in the sovereignty of other countries especially those in South America, Latin America and the Caribbeans. This strategy has been used in other countries but to a lesser extent. President Donald J Trump has taken this interference to a different level, where there is no veil or a cover up in the use of force, threat and terror acts, these acts are committed in a sense impunity to create a governance structure in another country based on assumptions, logical fallacies and pure business interest. He does not even care about his country, for all the expenses for his private terror model is borne by the US and the access to power and resources remains with the him the US President. And as ex-President there is scope to retain power as a private individual through business associations and ownership of close family members.

Is President Trump’s strategy fool proof not at all, but those behind Trump don’t need an instant fool proof strategy. A recent interview given by Trump and uploaded by C-Span is telling, there is nothing new in the interview but he has brought together all that he has said in different instances. A collage of different shots from the interview says everything of Trump’s forced international regime change policy and he emphasises the central role of force in achieving the goal, legality of the same does not even figure in his mindset, he believes he more powerful than any leader has been in America from the time of its creation.

His Plans for Iran after killing of Iran's Supreme Leader

a) Abhorrence to Nationalisation and indigenous alternatives

The immense distaste shown to Cubans by US President Trump is natural, as evident from Motto of Cuba “Homeland or Death, We Shall Overcome”. This motto is sure death for a corporate conceived digital governance model. There are other reasons for wanting curtail and ensure genocide of Cuban sovereignty; there is strong support from Cuban diaspora in US who wish for closer ties with American vision of governance, this would mean discrimination and concentration of power in the cities. Within privatised digital governance, there is scope for surveillance, and ensuring disparity as a way of management and ensure slow progress in groups considered a risk . This was the reality before Fidel Castro and would be worse with digital distant private governance planned by US President.

The President of the US is so distant from reality and he speaks on camera of “Friendly take over of Cuba” as though President of the US has the inalienable right to terrorise leader across the globe and take them over and that process is democratic and legal. From the response of SCOTUS, the entire Judiciary and US Congress, it seems like they have let him loose as a country to create chaos in the world.

Be it Cuba, Venezuela or Iran; unlike what America or American President or the diaspora from these countries in the US, neither the communist government of the Regime in Iran have been antagonistic towards its people, most often the problem started after sanctions made it difficult for the government to carry on smoothly with their governance. The American corporate strategy to throw away difficult governments is very simple, but it is not an ideology conflict, its pure business. For the US President and his Tech corporate to be interested there has to be a tech and profit angle, this would mean either natural resources in the concerned countries or their strategic location.

b) Use of technology in ensuring the terror act of use force to dethrone a government is followed by finding appropriate replacement not through the people but can be through software programme like Anthropic and others. It is terror act plan for different countries, and he presents these plans with no doubt about his power both legal and moral to carry it out.

When US President goes on record and states the US or US President and his team has a list of replacement they consider for being leader in Iran, but the first list and second list of people were all killed and they are working on third list. This kind of dialogue is not possible with human intelligence alone it would require the use of artificial intelligence like Anthropic for arriving such meticulous planning. Is this what American President is trying to enforce in Latin America, Middle East and Africa? Is Europe in line with such Digital Democratic process or rather Digital Hegemony through terror invasion.

Mr. US President, you are collecting a lot digital data of war, will all this be sold to Tech corporate for after all you went on record US is getting a good share of Venezuelan oil returns and that is fine as you did spend a lot on war with Venezuela. Is this your new model war business, you or rather US the nation will spend on war and you and your private/corporate firms will collect the returns. What will Americans get, body bags and lot negative feelings or discrimination from global population for letting loose their imbalanced President on the world population.

US President, US, and Israel have to be held accountable, even if war has ended! When US sanction anyone and every one at a drop of hat, US President through his action, US through its inaction and silence and Israel through its action need to be held accountable, for Justice and Universal Justice.

Sanction US President, US and Israel!

Molly

Reference

1. https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/terrorism

2. https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/terrorism.pdf

3. https://www.britanica.com/topic/terrorism/Types-of-terrorism p.9

4. The US and Israel attack Iran| BBC News on YouTube

https://youtu.be/IP_zxq6DDC8?si=mjsiicoD2oy_p_p9

5. Bloomberg-News Trump Says US Bombed Iran’s Main Three Nuclear Sites.

https://youtube.com/shorts/eziK64JM4a4?si=RMUYEtPch_IYJZcM

6. US strike kills 11 in strike on alleged drug boat tied to Venezuelan cartel, Trump says on YouTube

https://youtu.be/IDaAIf4tHj8?si=Qh0zfeEIbPuMwDh2