The Apartheid Game of the US President and the State, in the Genocide of Nations!

 The US has never been a Democracy, it has an apartheid approach to international relations, the best-case-studies are not in the present but in the past. Under the excuse of Weapons of Mass Destruction, it destroyed Iraq and ensured its economic ruin prior to the war the Iraqi dinar pegged at 3.21 USD is now 0.00076 USD; or take the case of Libya prior to the war or invasion by US the Libyan dinar was pegged at 1.26 or 1.27 per USD now stands at 0.16 USD. At present there are 40 major American Companies in Libya having high level discussions across sectors such as oil and gas, renewable energy, mining, health, electricity, transportation and infrastructure. This as part of the work to be carried out from the promised $71 billion investment of 14^th Sept 2025.

It is interesting to note that prior to the US companies entering Libya, US had put in place decades of Sanctions from 1986, the sanctions started because of support for Abu Nidal Organization, which was fighting for Palestinian liberation. It is interesting to note that at the time the West and UN were very vocal about justice citizens of Western countries as being victims of terror acts but no one cared two hoots about the situation in Palestine or the criminal occupation and torture of Palestinians. If, the international community and UN had stood for Justice and addressed the issue of Palestine, the present Genocide of Palestinians would have been avoided.

But it is the writ of US and Israel that defined justice then and the trend is continuing with a US President who believes in his own perception of morality and not in the US Constitution or International law. The US President has been given freedom to play havoc with global peace by US Congress and the latter is complicit to all terror acts and war crimes carried out by the US President and his team.

The present discriminatory approach to Iran, for it’s not having toed the line part and parcel of US strategy for the genocide of Nations. What is interesting is that in Americas, there are many nations which have nothing that they can claim as their own, neither sovereignty or even a currency. These are instances of total takeover, which often comes in handy at the UN when you have a list of nations that always vote in line with the US stand on any matter voted on.

US President Donald Trump want to play out the same format in the Middle East and in the process leave Israel in charge as a proxy. Gulf countries are too involved in their petty politics to see beyond their life time and the fact that Israel and US have only long-term plans, though Israel may beat US hands down in terms of their patience for mega control. With the digital world having a greater say, it would be companies, entities that have no interest in any country that will have the final say on the matter of governance. Of course, it would follow that there won’t be any human rights issue for surveillance and control would be the focus.

The game played on Iran

US has a problem with any country that focuses on nationalisation or indigenous alternatives, it is not political but a market-oriented approach. For example, if one were to consider health care, when health is planned for by private industry, what is economically viable for the company would take precedence over what is economical and sustainably viable for the community or nation. There is nothing personal, it just that it is totally impersonal and that is the problem when the US President wants to have a say in the sovereign reality of all nations across the globe. For his approach is not America First but rather American Tech companies First. That’s all.

The game with Iran is long term, the greatest fuel to ensuring logical fallacies govern the international narrative is the use of the western perception of a woman in a bikini as being freer than a woman wearing a hijab. The freedom of mind is far more complex than the dress one wears; the world view of a woman is also not determined by her dress code. Why mention this aspect, for Western countries and UN are often stating that Iran does not care for its people, especially at the UN. But Gini coefficient does not indicate the same. As per the data available for 2023, the Gini Coefficient value for Iran stood at 35.9 (extent of economic disparity within the population) at the same time the disparity was lower than that of Israel which stood at 37.9 and US, the great nation whose President is busy claiming to care for citizens across the globe the score is 41.8.

The situation in Iran is far more complex than what it is made out to be, the capital punishment is seen as a tool for control by a country that has been choked by sanctions for decades by US, EU and UN.  Just as with digital surveillance that considers filtering out individuals with minutest scope for breaking the law as a preventive measure, a country feeling throttled would be harsh on people it perceives to be anti-national or consider to be seditious. The country sees it as the best possible step to protect itself from a world that is hell bent on carrying out a genocide of its nation.

A clear example of diversity in perception, is that people in India, especially in Kashmir donated everything they have to war torn Iran, the late Supreme leader of Iran Ayatollah Khamenei was adored by the people and seen as a humane person who stood for ordinary people. West needs to understand that ignoring the mass murder committed by the US President sitting in his Oval office is seen in a far worse light than a resistance group or terrorist group using violence or terror acts to make their point. The latter group is seen as struggling for their survival or identity as people. Germans should understand the relevance of “Being” in human life, at least their philosophers did. The US President or Israel is not fighting for security or survival they are just carrying out war for pure greed and power.

The best example of this difference is the picture below, a handiwork of Israel, the great democracy for US and EU in the Middle East. This is case of a toddler Jawad who was arrested along with his father Osama Albonasar, and the infant was tortured by Israeli soldiers, the doctor identified the wounds to be the result of torture using cigarette butts or metal objects as the wounds had both entry and exit.

               In the Name of Security the handiwork of Israel and US War Crimes on Iran 

The ordinary people understand this difference that is why ignoring their personal needs they fight for people in another nation, a country they may never visit. They can understand and differentiate between the Scream of Humanity and the war cries of warmongers. If humanity had seriously wanted to reduce violence and crime, wouldn’t they have given serious thought to the approach developed in Norway, which has been far more successful than any other and not at all punitive. The goal was never the people and now it has become goal as set by companies or so-called AI. What would be  interesting is to understand how much of AI has been used in US attempts to take over the sovereignty of nations, for many of the plans seem clearly devoid of participation by any Human mind.

The apartheid system of the US

The US is not just occupying the top position with its 900 billion military industry; it also occupies one of the top spots for stock of nuclear arsenal and chemical weapons. Yet, no one questions it. Why? There has been no other country that has been responsible for largest number of wars as the US. It has always initiated war be it under the guise of Weapons of Mass Destruction or presence of terror group or being a terror state. Yet, no one points out that it is the US that has Weapons of Mass Destruction and carries of terror acts (as per definition of US domestic law or international law) in order to change sovereign realities of nations, especially to be friendly towards the business needs of American companies. America destroyed Iraq and no weapons of mass destruction were found. But no legal system has ever held the American president or US Congress accountable, it is this that breeds a situation where Israel feels it can carry out genocide and no one will dare question it.

US and Israel have been in the forefront to state that Iran can not enrich Uranium or even opt for nuclear energy for civil purposes. The point is other than the might of military what power does US President or US Congress have on any other sovereign nation, than bomb it to adherence. It is time the international legal system woke up to terror acts and war crimes carried out by US President Trump.

The US or US President may state that US is no longer enriching uranium or doing research using uranium or doing research on chemical weapons. This is hilarious, for such measures are of no relevance. For any country that has managed to develop a nuclear warhead and test it can use computer simulation for further research at present. What is developing in the globe is an attempt by the US to use its might to ensure that future research will always remain beyond reach of any country that has not developed and tested a nuclear warhead or is not part of the so called friendly, obedient nations.

When US states it does extensive research on detecting nerve agents, the question is how does it do this without having any idea of its impact? Aren’t animal research and testing of different synthetic nerve agents central to its studies and implementation of research findings in the field of detection.

The interest in Iran, is not based on human rights issue but the scope that Iran could evolve further in nuclear energy and be a competition for Israel. At present the US war model has taken a beating from Iran’s indigenous cost-effective approach. That threat is what US President and Israel seeks to eliminate, they are not looking for peace, but for greater control over military industry across the globe.

 

Molly Charles