MollyCharles-Reflections

  Seriously, Mr. Marco Rubio, Secretary of State, the world knows there exists The Law of the Sea and it is the international legal framework governing all rights, duties, and jurisdictions of states in the maritime environment. But, maybe US does not understand its existence for though it mobilized the globe to create it, the US is not a party to the Law of the Sea or United Nations Conventions on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Want to speak on its adherence by nations, Secretary of State, then be a Party to the Law of the Sea! Marco Rubio respects international law for all nations, except that the US which is exempt from adherence, for that’s the American way of Democracy! When the US President set the trend for American Democracy to include as strategy, bombing fishermen in international waters killing around 145 people, Mr. Marco Rubio, what happened to international law or even specifically the Law of the Sea. Marco Rubio, your President carried out Mass Murder and claimed...

United Nations whether set up as an aspiration for a better tomorrow or a limited framework to prevent another world war with powerful nations in control at UNSC or whether it is a smokescreen for US to conceptualize, facilitate, lead creation of norms through conventions and beyond, only to breakaway from their ratification and on its part stating its domestic laws will be its international framework with other nations will falling in line to this disparity in power sharing.  But this trend of thought may be turn irrelevant, when tech governance take hold. An Experimentation- the United States Beyond all the chaos created for media and the dramatization of the personal quirks of the U.S. President Trump, which at times are clearly acts of terror or war crimes but portrayed as just acts, “dropping bombs on unarmed fishermen miles away in international waters”, carried out in a lighter vein. A clean visual hallucination of victory is presented to the world, where the death of hu...

  The art of narration selection, building on the favoured perspective and creating acceptance happens not just in the media, the UN platform but also within institutions supposed to deliver justice, this is clearly seen in many instances with the United States. At times, it is the sound of silence from the US court that deafens humanity, as in the case of the US President proudly claiming he has bombed fishing boats, and his administration even opting for the double strike in case some soul had been left alive to bear witness to the incident. Not one official or the judiciary has asked about legality of extrajudicial killing or how did the US President or any of the official determine that fishing boat contained drugs, when the only option for detection was from the skies above, miles aways from the boat. Besides it is common knowledge that physical examination along with chemical testing is necessary to determine the chemical composition of the substance suspected to be drugs. ...

United Nations a union of Nations, looks good on paper or as a side show for raising funds, but it does not wipe way the silent screams that fills the rubble of Gaza, or the shock of massacre of school children in Iran, or the planned attack through pager, master minded to kill at will, irrespective of the role of chance that determines who takes the fall.  For the United Nations nothing changed, it turned a page and carried on… At the best a small tap on knuckle of Israel, the pressure tempered with fear of the lord and master’s response the United States, a so-called democracy that uses legal loop holes to support with pride a genocide, a country where Judiciary and Constitution lie silent at the feet of Presidential Executive Orders, scared to even flinch when acknowledging the reality of their plight. United Nations a Union of Nations is a myth, an opium to seduce nations with a dream of equality that has been and continues to be shredded on UN floor by the United States and Is...

Preamble We the people of United Nations, as deemed fit by the chosen ones with narrative input from the first-born nation the United States, determined   to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, with due consideration of it being palatable to the great military industry of the United States and to the need for simulation data for finalisation of digital accuracy by the digitized military industry, and being in line with degree of vulnerability and isolation branded on the targeted nation, we will consider scourge of war which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind, and to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, after we isolate it from sovereign rights and put in under exclusive patronage and guardianship of the United States’ President’s Executive Orders and United States Code, then we will reaffirm faith in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and if resources and time permit reaffirm faith in ...

President Trump has a love for the Abraham Accords that is no a secret as he is the visionary of the same, but what is not common knowledge is that President Trump was in the process of making the same a part of global trade deal with any country that traded with Israel or the US. A proxy global control, this not very uncommon to the US as it has often unilaterally decided on policy and legislation to address human problem only to have its plans backfire, as seen in case of criminalisation and penalisation of all forms of drugs and drug use. In case of drug use or any other issue the intrusion into domestic legal system or sovereignty of other nations is through assertion of concern for the problem and related aspects, here it was drugs, cultural use or medicinal use of drugs and related methods of control. The Abraham Accords is a pure trade deal, a financial arrangement through agreement, it has no juridical links to domestic criminal law of any nation, other than one that Presiden...

  In recent days the media has been focusing on the US President threatening to “Take over Cuba”. He elaborated further according to him, “I can take it, make it and do whatever I want with it”. It is strange to hear the US President speak about another sovereign country in this manner, evidently President Trump seems to understand sovereignty only in terms of the US and sees no relevance of it to its neighbors, as clearly illustrated in case of Venezuela. Americans from his party tend to brush it aside by saying that's his style, but that’s exactly the point, that can’t be his style as a President of the US or any other country, a verbal threat from a person in power cannot be condoned or legitimatized as part of international relationship. The abuse of Cuba is beyond political ideological difference, or a democracy’s anger at communist ideology, it is historically planned control of the entire region by the United States to make United States of Americas under the total control...